Celeron M 430 vs Pentium Dual T3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T3200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.40
+264%
Celeron M 430
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.11

Pentium Dual Core T3200 outperforms Celeron M 430 by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30083372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreCeleron M
Power efficiency1.080.38
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz533 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T3200 0.40
+264%
Celeron M 430 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T3200 631
+273%
Celeron M 430 169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.11
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 27 Watt

Pentium Dual T3200 has a 263.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron M 430, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Celeron M 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200
Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 82 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 25 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T3200 or Celeron M 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.