Athlon 64 X2 3800+ vs Pentium Dual T3200
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Dual Core T3200 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3268 | 3302 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.42 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Manchester (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) | August 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 256K |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Athlon 64 X2 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 89 Watt |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 89 Watt |
Pentium Dual T3200 has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 8800% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+.
Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T3200 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
