Xeon Gold 5416S vs Pentium Dual T2390

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T2390
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.36
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
22.65
+6192%

Xeon Gold 5416S outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2390 by a whopping 6192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3040229
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.97
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Coreno data
Power efficiency0.9714.29
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$944

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T2390 0.36
Xeon Gold 5416S 22.65
+6192%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2390 568
Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
+6234%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 22.65
Recency 1 March 2008 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

Pentium Dual T2390 has 328.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has a 6191.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5416S is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T2390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T2390 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5416S is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
Pentium Dual Core T2390
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 60 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T2390 or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.