Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Pentium Dual T2310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T2310
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.31
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.46
+48.4%

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2310 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33413158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Dual Coreno data
Power efficiency0.380.22
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno dataMay 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium Dual T2310 0.31
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 0.46
+48.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2310 538
Samples: 85
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 807
+50%
Samples: 1170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.46
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

Pentium Dual T2310 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+, on the other hand, has a 48.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T2310 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310
Pentium Dual Core T2310
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 243 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium Dual Core T2310 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.