Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Pentium D 960

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 960
2006, $523
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.47

M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms Pentium D 960 by a whopping 1991% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3198947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency0.15no data
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePresler (2005−2007)no data
Release date23 April 2006 (19 years ago)18 October 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$523no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache16 KB (per core)2.3 MB
L2 cache2 MB (per die)28 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors376 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.2V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775,PLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 WattW

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium D 960 0.47
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 9.83
+1991%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium D 960 822
Samples: 46
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17216
+1994%
Samples: 1377

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 9.83
Recency 23 April 2006 18 October 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core has a 1991.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium D 960 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium D 960 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 47 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 115 votes

Rate M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium D 960 and M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.