A4-3330MX vs Pentium D 960

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 960
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.47
+9.3%

Pentium D 960 outperforms A4-3330MX by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31463183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.150.41
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePresler (2005−2007)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date23 April 2006 (19 years ago)20 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$523no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache16 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per die)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors376 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775,PLGA775FS1
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium D 960 0.47
+9.3%
A4-3330MX 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium D 960 822
+8%
Samples: 46
A4-3330MX 761
Samples: 38

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.43
Recency 23 April 2006 20 December 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

Pentium D 960 has a 9.3% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-3330MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Pentium D 960 and AMD A4-3330MX.

Note that Pentium D 960 is a desktop processor while A4-3330MX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960
AMD A4-3330MX
A4-3330MX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 47 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate A4-3330MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium D 960 and A4-3330MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.