Ryzen Threadripper 1955X vs Pentium D 925
Primary details
Comparing Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Presler (2005−2007) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 1 October 2006 (18 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $74 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 16 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB (per die) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 32768 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 2x 81 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 62 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 376 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1.2V-1.3375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA775,PLGA775 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Pentium D 925 has 31.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1955X, on the other hand, has 400% more physical cores, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 925 and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.