Xeon W-3175X vs Pentium B970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium B970
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
24.03
+3333%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Pentium B970 by a whopping 3333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2614191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.75
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)19 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125$2,999
Current price$174 (1.4x MSRP)$1500 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C85 °C
Number of transistors504 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt255 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB512 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth21.3 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium B970 0.70
Xeon W-3175X 24.03
+3333%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Pentium B970 by 3333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Pentium B970 1082
Xeon W-3175X 37167
+3335%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Pentium B970 by 3335% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium B970 356
Xeon W-3175X 1444
+306%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Pentium B970 by 306% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Pentium B970 573
Xeon W-3175X 13425
+2243%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Pentium B970 by 2243% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 24.03
Recency 1 January 2012 19 December 2018
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Cost $125 $2999
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 255 Watt

The Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium B970 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium B970 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium B970 and Xeon W-3175X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium B970
Pentium B970
Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 209 votes

Rate Pentium B970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium B970 or Xeon W-3175X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.