V-Series V160 vs Pentium 957
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 957 and V-Series V160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | AMD V-Series |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 13 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 December 2010 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 957 and V-Series V160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 3200 MHz |
Multiplier | 12 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 957 and V-Series V160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | BGA1023 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 957 and V-Series V160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
FMA | + | no data |
VirusProtect | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium 957 and V-Series V160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 957 and V-Series V160 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 957 and V-Series V160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 957 and V-Series V160.
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 13 June 2011 | 1 December 2010 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Pentium 957 has an age advantage of 6 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 47.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 957 and V-Series V160. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 957 and V-Series V160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.