Ryzen 3 8300G vs Pentium 8505 (IPU)
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| Release date | 23 February 2022 (2 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $176 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 5 (Penta-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 137 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 20,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 48EU | AMD Radeon 740M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 14 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 February 2022 | 8 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 5 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Pentium 8505 (IPU) has 25% more physical cores, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Pentium 8505 (IPU) is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 8505 (IPU) and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
