EPYC 4244P vs Pentium 6805

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 6805
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.84
EPYC 4244P
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.66
+522%

EPYC 4244P outperforms Pentium 6805 by a whopping 522% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1681361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data53.02
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency17.5925.23
Architecture codenameIce Lake-Y (2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm
Die size123 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1526AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 6805 2.84
EPYC 4244P 17.66
+522%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 6805 4424
EPYC 4244P 27530
+522%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.84 17.66
Recency 1 October 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium 6805 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has a 521.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 6805 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 6805 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 6805 and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 6805
Pentium 6805
AMD EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 190 votes

Rate Pentium 6805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4244P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 6805 or EPYC 4244P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.