Celeron 827 vs Pentium 4 HT 670
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | May 2005 (20 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 HT 670 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 14 |
| L1 cache | 28 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 169 million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 HT 670 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 670 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 HT 670 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 670 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 17 Watt |
Pentium 4 HT 670 has 100% more threads.
Celeron 827, on the other hand, has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 394.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium 4 HT 670 and Intel Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 HT 670 is a desktop processor while Celeron 827 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
