Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Pentium 4 HT 662

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiencyno data48.77
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release dateNovember 2005 (19 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache28 KBno data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size109 mm2no data
Number of transistors169 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket775FP8
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 28 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 662 has -87.5% more threads.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 HT 662 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 662 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 HT 662
Pentium 4 HT 662
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium 4 HT 662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 HT 662 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.