EPYC 7713 vs Pentium 4 HT 661
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 65 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.41 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 8.90 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Cedar Mill (2006) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 5 January 2006 (20 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $401 | $7,060 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.68 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 20 |
| L1 cache | 28 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 69 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 188 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 775 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 HT 661 and EPYC 7713.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2006 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 86 Watt | 225 Watt |
Pentium 4 HT 661 has 161.6% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium 4 HT 661 and AMD EPYC 7713. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 HT 661 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7713 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
