EPYC 9575F vs Pentium 4 HT 520

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenamePrescott (2001−2005)Turin (2024)
Release dateJune 2004 (20 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache16 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size109 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors125 million66,520 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 400 Watt

Pentium 4 HT 520 has 376.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 HT 520 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9575F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 520 and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
Pentium 4 HT 520
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 HT 520 or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.