Core i5-12400F vs Pentium 4 HT 3.2E
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 589 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 5 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | February 2004 (20 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 16 KB | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 18 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | 109 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 478 | FCLGA1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Status | no data | Launched |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-12400F has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 76.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 HT 3.2E and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.