Celeron B800 vs Pentium 4 511
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2990 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.14 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | January 2005 (19 years ago) | 19 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $80 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PLGA775 | G2 (988B) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron B800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Pentium 4 511 is a desktop processor while Celeron B800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 511 and Celeron B800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
