EPYC 8224PN vs Pentium 4 2.4 GHz

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3651not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiency0.05no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Siena (2023−2024)
Release dateno data18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,015

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,750 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP6
Power consumption (TDP)59.8 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 120 Watt

Pentium 4 2.4 GHz has 103.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 8224PN, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and AMD EPYC 8224PN. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 2.4 GHz is a desktop processor while EPYC 8224PN is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
AMD EPYC 8224PN
EPYC 8224PN

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 231 votes

Rate Pentium 4 2.4 GHz on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 8224PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and EPYC 8224PN, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.