Atom Z560 vs Pentium 4 1.80

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3666not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.04no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameWillamette (2000−2001)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release dateAugust 2001 (24 years ago)1 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache8 KB56 KB
L2 cache256 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography180 nm45 nm
Die size217 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistors42 million47 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.75V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket478PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)67 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2unknown

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 180 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 67 Watt 2 Watt

Atom Z560 has 100% more threads, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium 4 1.80 and Intel Atom Z560. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 1.80 is a desktop processor while Atom Z560 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 1.80
Pentium 4 1.80
Intel Atom Z560
Atom Z560

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 294 votes

Rate Pentium 4 1.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Atom Z560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 4 1.80 and Atom Z560, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.