Apple M1 vs Pentium 3805U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3805U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.74

Apple M1 outperforms Pentium 3805U by a whopping 601% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26591192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency4.65no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)no data
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3805U and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3805U and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsApple M1 8-Core GPU
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3805U and Apple M1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3805U and Apple M1.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3805U 0.74
Apple M1 5.19
+601%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3805U 1178
Apple M1 8207
+597%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 5.19
Recency 1 March 2015 10 November 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 601.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3805U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3805U and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3805U
Pentium 3805U
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 25 votes

Rate Pentium 3805U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2230 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3805U or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.