EPYC 9845 vs Pentium 3558U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2761not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency4.10no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$13,564

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads2320
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCBGA1168SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 2 320
Chip lithography 22 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 390 Watt

Pentium 3558U has 2500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 7900% more physical cores and 15900% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium 3558U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 107 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3558U or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.