Solo U1300 vs Pentium 3558U
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 3558U outperforms Core Solo U1300 by a whopping 700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2781 | 3414 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 4.07 | 1.53 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 January 2014 (11 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.06 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V - 1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 0.08 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Pentium 3558U has a 700% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.
Solo U1300, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
The Pentium 3558U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo U1300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and Core Solo U1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
