Celeron E3300 vs Pentium 3558U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.65
+30%
Celeron E3300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.50

Pentium 3558U outperforms Celeron E3300 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27612892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency4.100.73
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)30 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$70

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA1168LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3558U 0.65
+30%
Celeron E3300 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3558U 1040
+30.8%
Celeron E3300 795

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.50
Recency 1 January 2014 30 August 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium 3558U has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 3558U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 3558U is a notebook processor while Celeron E3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and Celeron E3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U
Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 107 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3558U or Celeron E3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.