Celeron M 540 vs PRO A8-8650B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1888not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency2.94no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A8-8650B 3211
+492%
Celeron M 540 542

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2015 1 October 2007
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

PRO A8-8650B has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 540, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A8-8650B is a desktop processor while Celeron M 540 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A8-8650B and Celeron M 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A8-8650B
PRO A8-8650B
Intel Celeron M 540
Celeron M 540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 140 votes

Rate PRO A8-8650B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Celeron M 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A8-8650B or Celeron M 540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.