EPYC 9175F vs PRO A12-9800E

VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1936not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency5.41no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,256

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size250 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million133,040 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 320 Watt

PRO A12-9800E has 814.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A12-9800E is a desktop processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800E and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800E
PRO A12-9800E
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 11 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800E or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.