Processor N95 vs PRO A12-9800B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-9800B
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.74
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 15 Watt
3.10
+78.2%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19431546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Alder Lake-N
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$676 no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.4  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8no data
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-9800B 1.74
Processor N95 3.10
+78.2%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

PRO A12-9800B 2593
Processor N95 4783
+84.5%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 84% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 7056
Processor N95 13854
+96.4%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 96% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 3249
Processor N95 5952
+83.2%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 83% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

PRO A12-9800B 13.8
+23.5%
Processor N95 17.04

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 23% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

PRO A12-9800B 3
Processor N95 6
+114%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 114% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 225
Processor N95 445
+97.8%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 98% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 75
Processor N95 151
+101%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 101% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

PRO A12-9800B 0.88
Processor N95 1.83
+108%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 108% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1.8
Processor N95 2.7
+50%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 50% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1383
Processor N95 2320
+67.7%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 68% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 17
Processor N95 32
+96.4%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 96% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 77
Processor N95 162
+111%

Processor N95 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 111% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 3.10
Recency 1 June 2016 3 January 2023
Threads 4 44 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-9800B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800B and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800B
PRO A12-9800B
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 531 vote

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800B or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.