GX-210JA vs PRO A12-9800B
Primary details
Comparing PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2047 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Bristol Ridge | AMD |
Power efficiency | 10.66 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Temash (2013) |
Release date | 1 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FP4 | FT3 BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
RAID | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2016 | 23 May 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
PRO A12-9800B has an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800B and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.