AMD FX-7600P vs PRO A12-9800B

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

PRO A12-9800B
1.75
+2.9%

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 3% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18931920
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Kaveri
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 June 2016 (7 years old)4 June 2014 (9 years old)
Current price$676 no data

Technical specs

PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus supportno dataBGA (FP3)
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x886x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-2133 Controller
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
FRTC11
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management++
VirusProtect++
RAID+no data
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4-1866DDR3-2133
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core count88
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-9800B 1.75
+2.9%
FX-7600P 1.70

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 3% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A12-9800B 2691
+3.1%
FX-7600P 2611

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

PRO A12-9800B 543
+32.4%
FX-7600P 410

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 32% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

PRO A12-9800B 1148
FX-7600P 1159
+1%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 1% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

PRO A12-9800B 2593
+1.5%
FX-7600P 2555

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 1% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 7056
FX-7600P 7418
+5.1%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

PRO A12-9800B 3249
FX-7600P 3569
+9.8%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 10% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

PRO A12-9800B 13.8
+18.8%
FX-7600P 16.4

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 19% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

PRO A12-9800B 3
+5.3%
FX-7600P 2

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 225
FX-7600P 228
+1.3%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 1% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

PRO A12-9800B 75
FX-7600P 75

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

PRO A12-9800B 0.88
+3.5%
FX-7600P 0.85

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1.8
+2.9%
FX-7600P 1.8

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 3% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 1383
FX-7600P 1500
+8.5%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 8% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 77
FX-7600P 82
+5.8%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 6% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

PRO A12-9800B 17
FX-7600P 18
+6.7%

FX-7600P outperforms PRO A12-9800B by 7% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 2031
+7.3%
FX-7600P 1893

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 7% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 5326
+0.3%
FX-7600P 5308

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

PRO A12-9800B 5705
+15%
FX-7600P 4961

PRO A12-9800B outperforms FX-7600P by 15% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.75 1.70
Recency 1 June 2016 4 June 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800B and FX-7600P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800B
PRO A12-9800B
AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 24 votes

Rate AMD PRO A12-9800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate AMD FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800B or FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.