EPYC 7763 vs PRO A12-9800B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-9800B
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.75
EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
55.03
+3045%

EPYC 7763 outperforms PRO A12-9800B by a whopping 3045% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking201424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.27
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size250 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-9800B 1.75
EPYC 7763 55.03
+3045%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A12-9800B 2691
EPYC 7763 84706
+3048%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

PRO A12-9800B 557
EPYC 7763 1344
+141%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

PRO A12-9800B 1176
EPYC 7763 10361
+781%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 55.03
Recency 1 June 2016 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

PRO A12-9800B has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has a 3044.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-9800B in performance tests.

Be aware that PRO A12-9800B is a notebook processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800B and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800B
PRO A12-9800B
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800B or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.