Celeron J3455E vs PRO A12-9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-9800
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.35
+72.8%
Celeron J3455E
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.36

PRO A12-9800 outperforms Celeron J3455E by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19622418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.405.26
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)no data
Release date3 October 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.3 GHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 500
iGPU core count8no data
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12+
OpenGLno data+
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes86

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

PRO A12-9800 2.35
+72.8%
Celeron J3455E 1.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

PRO A12-9800 3775
+72.1%
Celeron J3455E 2193

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 1.36
Recency 3 October 2016 1 July 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

PRO A12-9800 has a 72.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron J3455E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The AMD PRO A12-9800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron J3455E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800
Intel Celeron J3455E
Celeron J3455E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Celeron J3455E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors PRO A12-9800 and Celeron J3455E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.