EPYC 9655P vs PRO A12-8870E

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1977	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.62
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Power efficiency	5.14	23.67
Architecture codename	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Turin (2024)
Release date	October 2016 (8 years ago)	10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	96
Threads	4	192
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	4.5 GHz
L1 cache	no data	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Die size	250 mm2	12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors	3,100 million	99,780 million
64 bit support	+	+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	+
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR5
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	N/A
iGPU core count	8	no data
Enduro	n/a	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort

n/a

-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.90	100.00
Physical cores	4	96
Threads	4	192
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	400 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870E and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---