i7-1280P vs PRO A12-8870E
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-1280P outperforms PRO A12-8870E by a whopping 578% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1962 | 586 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-P |
| Power efficiency | 5.14 | 43.53 |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Alder Lake-P (2022) |
| Release date | October 2016 (8 years ago) | 23 February 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 217 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Enduro | n/a | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.45 GHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 96 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
| DisplayPort | n/a | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.90 | 12.88 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
i7-1280P has a 577.9% higher aggregate performance score, 250% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.
The Core i7-1280P is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-8870E in performance tests.
Note that PRO A12-8870E is a desktop processor while Core i7-1280P is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870E and Core i7-1280P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
