i3-530 vs PRO A12-8870

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-8870
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.44
+157%
Core i3-530
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.95

PRO A12-8870 outperforms Core i3-530 by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17552504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.541.23
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz0.93 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
iGPU core count8no data
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduron/a-
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-8870 2.44
+157%
i3-530 0.95

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A12-8870 3869
+158%
i3-530 1501

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.44 0.95
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

PRO A12-8870 has a 156.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

The PRO A12-8870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870 and Core i3-530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-8870
PRO A12-8870
Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 216 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 439 votes

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-8870 or Core i3-530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.