A6-3650 vs PRO A10-9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-9700
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.36
+77.4%

PRO A10-9700 outperforms A6-3650 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17062166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$31 $24

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsRadeon HD 6530D
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-9700 2.36
+77.4%
A6-3650 1.33

PRO A10-9700 outperforms A6-3650 by 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A10-9700 3652
+77%
A6-3650 2063

PRO A10-9700 outperforms A6-3650 by 77% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 1.33
Recency 27 July 2017 30 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

The PRO A10-9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-9700 and A6-3650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-9700
PRO A10-9700
AMD A6-3650
A6-3650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate PRO A10-9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-9700 or A6-3650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.