Core i3-12100TE vs PRO A10-8850B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8850B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.43
Core i3-12100TE
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
7.96
+228%

i3-12100TE outperforms PRO A10-8850B by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1688880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date29 September 2015 (8 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size245 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+1700
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSXno data+

Security technologies

PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 730
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8850B 2.43
i3-12100TE 7.96
+228%

Core i3-12100TE outperforms PRO A10-8850B by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A10-8850B 3752
i3-12100TE 12314
+228%

Core i3-12100TE outperforms PRO A10-8850B by 228% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 7.96
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i3-12100TE is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8850B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8850B and Core i3-12100TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8850B
PRO A10-8850B
Intel Core i3-12100TE
Core i3-12100TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate PRO A10-8850B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate Core i3-12100TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8850B or Core i3-12100TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.