m3-7Y30 vs PRO A10-8750B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8750B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.85
+13.5%
Core m3-7Y30
2016
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.63

PRO A10-8750B outperforms Core m3-7Y30 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20022092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core m3
Power efficiency1.8434.28
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$281

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.861 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 615
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.5
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1610

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8750B 1.85
+13.5%
m3-7Y30 1.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8750B 2935
+13.5%
m3-7Y30 2585

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.85 1.63
Recency 29 September 2015 30 August 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

PRO A10-8750B has a 13.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

m3-7Y30, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2275% lower power consumption.

The PRO A10-8750B is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-7Y30 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A10-8750B is a desktop processor while Core m3-7Y30 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8750B and Core m3-7Y30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8750B
PRO A10-8750B
Intel Core m3-7Y30
Core m3-7Y30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 59 votes

Rate PRO A10-8750B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 115 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8750B or Core m3-7Y30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.