A6-9225 vs Opteron X3216

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron X3216
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.95
+13.1%
A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84

Opteron X3216 outperforms A6-9225 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X3216 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25142585
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency5.995.30
Architecture codenameExcavator (2017−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X3216 and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache160 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X3216 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X3216 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X3216 and A6-9225 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X3216 and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon Rx Series 4CUAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X3216 and A6-9225.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron X3216 0.95
+13.1%
A6-9225 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron X3216 1514
+13.5%
A6-9225 1334

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron X3216 380
+40.2%
A6-9225 271

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron X3216 645
+42.4%
A6-9225 453

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.84
Recency 10 June 2017 1 June 2018

Opteron X3216 has a 13.1% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-9225, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months.

The Opteron X3216 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron X3216 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9225 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X3216 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X3216
Opteron X3216
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X3216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2301 vote

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X3216 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.