Ryzen 7 170 vs Opteron X2 880

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiencyno data16.82
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameEgypt (2005−2006)Rembrandt-R (2023−2025)
Release dateSeptember 2005 (20 years ago)1 October 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors233 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket940FP7
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 170 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron X2 880 and AMD Ryzen 7 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron X2 880 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 170 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 880
Opteron X2 880
AMD Ryzen 7 170
Ryzen 7 170

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 880 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron X2 880 and Ryzen 7 170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.