Athlon MP 1800+ vs Opteron X2 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon MP
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameItaly (2005−2006)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateMarch 2006 (19 years ago)15 October 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$302

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2 285 and Athlon MP 1800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.53 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data266 MT/s
Multiplierno data11.5
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data128 mm2
Number of transistors233 million38 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2 285 and Athlon MP 1800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
Socket940no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 285 and Athlon MP 1800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 66 Watt

Opteron X2 285 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon MP 1800+, on the other hand, has 43.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron X2 285 and AMD Athlon MP 1800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2 285
Opteron X2 285
AMD Athlon MP 1800+
Athlon MP 1800+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Opteron X2 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon MP 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron X2 285 and Athlon MP 1800+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.