Xeon Phi 7235 vs Opteron A1170
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Opteron | Intel Xeon Phi |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A57 (2016) | Knights Mill (2017) |
| Release date | 14 January 2016 (9 years ago) | 1 December 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 32K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.550-1.2V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP1 | SVLCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s | 102.381 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron A1170 and Xeon Phi 7235.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 36 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 January 2016 | 1 December 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 64 |
| Threads | 8 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 250 Watt |
Opteron A1170 has 681.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7235, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron A1170 and Intel Xeon Phi 7235. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
