EPYC 7343 vs Opteron A1150
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 256 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.46 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | AMD Opteron | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.97 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A57 (2016) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 14 January 2016 (9 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,565 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | no data | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | SP1 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 190 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 4 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s | 204.795 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron A1150 and EPYC 7343.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 January 2016 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 8 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 190 Watt |
Opteron A1150 has 493.8% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7343, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron A1150 and AMD EPYC 7343. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
