Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon X5675 vs Opteron 6380
Aggregated performance score
Opteron 6380
2012
16 cores / 16 threads
4.37
+4%
Opteron 6380 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1254 | 1285 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.76 | 2.19 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (11 years old) | 14 February 2011 (13 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,150 | $162 |
| Current price | $598 (0.5x MSRP) | $78 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Xeon X5675 has 188% better value for money than Opteron 6380.
Technical specs
Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.46 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 12288 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,170 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
| Socket | G34 | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 288 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 32 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Opteron 6380 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Opteron 6380 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 4% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon X5675 outperforms Opteron 6380 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6380 outperforms Xeon X5675 by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 4.37 | 4.20 |
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 14 February 2011 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Cost | $1150 | $162 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6380 and Xeon X5675, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
