Ryzen 7 4700U vs Opteron 6380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6380
2012, $1,150
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.79
Ryzen 7 4700U
2020
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.47
+97.1%

Ryzen 7 4700U outperforms Opteron 6380 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16261128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency3.5353.36
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date5 November 2012 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache768 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FP6
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 6380 3.79
Ryzen 7 4700U 7.47
+97.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 6380 6687
Samples: 12
Ryzen 7 4700U 13174
+97%
Samples: 2029

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Opteron 6380 415
Ryzen 7 4700U 1354
+226%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Opteron 6380 3208
Ryzen 7 4700U 4928
+53.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.79 7.47
Recency 5 November 2012 6 January 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

Opteron 6380 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 4700U, on the other hand, has a 97.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4700U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6380 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 4700U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6380
Opteron 6380
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
Ryzen 7 4700U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Opteron 6380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1449 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 6380 and Ryzen 7 4700U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.