Performance per price, higher is better.
Intel Xeon X5670 vs AMD Opteron 6376
Combined performance score
Xeon X5670 outperforms Opteron 6376 by 9% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1393 | 1328 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.33 | 1.06 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Xeon (Desktop) |
Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
Release date | 5 November 2012 (11 years old) | 16 March 2010 (14 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $750 | $67 |
Current price | $915 (1.2x MSRP) | $80 (1.2x MSRP) |
Xeon X5670 has 221% better value for money than Opteron 6376.
Technical specs
Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 6400 MHz |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,170 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
Socket | G34 | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 288 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 32 GB/s |
ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X5670 outperforms Opteron 6376 by 9% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X5670 outperforms Opteron 6376 by 9% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon X5670 outperforms Opteron 6376 by 35% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Opteron 6376 outperforms Xeon X5670 by 36% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 3.63 | 3.96 |
Recency | 5 November 2012 | 16 March 2010 |
Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
Threads | 16 | 12 |
Cost | $750 | $67 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 95 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6376 and Xeon X5670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.