Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Opteron 6376

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6376
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.51
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
14.43
+311%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Opteron 6376 by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1526495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.61no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency2.8948.77
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$750no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (per die)no data
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketG34FP8
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6376 3.51
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 14.43
+311%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6376 5572
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22919
+311%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 14.43
Recency 5 November 2012 1 October 2024
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 28 Watt

Opteron 6376 has 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 311.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 0% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 310.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6376 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6376 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6376 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6376
Opteron 6376
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 6 votes

Rate Opteron 6376 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6376 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.