Ryzen 7 4750U vs Opteron 6376
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1789 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.20 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 2.94 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (13 years ago) | 7 May 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $750 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 9,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-4266 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6376 and Ryzen 7 4750U.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 7 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
Opteron 6376 has 100% more physical cores.
Ryzen 7 4750U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 6376 and AMD Ryzen 7 4750U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 6376 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 4750U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
