Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Opteron 6348
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX outperforms Opteron 6348 by a whopping 1268% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1432 | 25 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 13.54 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.64 | 7.38 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,099 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6348 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 136 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.47 | 61.15 |
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 23 July 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 350 Watt |
Opteron 6348 has 204.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, on the other hand, has a 1268% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 6348 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
