Xeon E7220 vs Opteron 6344
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1751 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.44 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.27 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | no data |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $415 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 12 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 64 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | no data |
| Socket | G34 | PPGA604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6344 and Xeon E7220.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 1 July 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 80 Watt |
Opteron 6344 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Xeon E7220, on the other hand, has 43.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 6344 and Intel Xeon E7220. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
