EPYC 9755 vs Opteron 6328

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1582not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.75no data
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Turin (2024)
Release date5 November 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$575$12,984

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)128
Threads8256
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size2x 315 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,400 million133,040 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 November 2012 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 128
Threads 8 256
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 500 Watt

Opteron 6328 has 334.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9755, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6328 and EPYC 9755, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6328
Opteron 6328
AMD EPYC 9755
EPYC 9755

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 6328 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6328 or EPYC 9755, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.