EPYC 9335 vs Opteron 6281
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1579 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $988 | $3,178 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 2 |
| Socket | G34 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 210 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6281 and EPYC 9335.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 32 |
| Threads | 16 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 210 Watt |
Opteron 6281 has 61.5% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 6281 and AMD EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
